Providing leadership in Christian distance education through resources, community, and promotion
ACCESS 2015 Report Click here for photos from the conference! Executive Director’s Overview Although it seems that each year’s conference tops the previous one(s), I can’t help but think that this conference was truly one of the best ever. We had two excellent plenary sessions as well as an outstanding keynote address. The workshop sessions were a great blend of application as well as theory, research, and scholarship. The discussions I heard were filled with exciting ideas for the future as well as solid application of what is being done in our member schools. This year’s theme, Rediscovering our roots: Simple. Missional. Technological.set the tone for understanding the future of Christian distance education situated in what has been a part of the 44 years of ACCESS history. The geographical location for the conference, Lancaster Bible College, located in Amish country, provided a backdrop for asking questions such as “how do we remain true to our heritage without sacrificing the generations to come?” In a similar vein, some of us may be asking “How do we remain true to the mission of biblical or theological online education without avoiding missional drift as we pursue the latest technological advances?” Additionally, how do we maintain proper pedagogy as the foundation of solid teaching and learning in an online population? How do we situate our institutions, organizations, or churches that provide distance education within the larger purposes of the mission of God and the mission of the church? If the mission of God is to declare his salvation to the ends of the earth and edify His people so that they grow to full maturity in Christ, then how do we position our programs to accomplish those purposes? How do you understand what you are doing in online Christian education to be advancing the mission of the church? In the 44 years that ACCESS has been in existence, we have been fortunate enough to hold on to and embrace our heritage while reaching out to newer constituencies. ACCESS is unique in many ways but in particular it is an association passionate about two things in particular: (1) the spiritual or Christian worldview of our programs and instruction and (2) some capacity of distance education. Better yet, ACCESS is missional. God’s mission has a twofold purpose: an outward purpose to declare God’s glory among the nations and an inward focus to edify God’s people so that they grow to full maturity in Christ. Both purposes are necessary because the outward witness to share the good news can only be sustained by witnesses who are growing in their faith. What we do in our respective institutions should reflect that outward and inward trajectory of God’s mission. Walter Brugeggemann wrote that "every community that wants to last beyond a single generation must concern itself with education" (The Creative Word, p. 1). While the education Brueggemann had in mind was primarily parental and centered in the home, the kind of education that we provide to sustain the mission of the church comes in many formats and delivery systems. If we want to be missional in how we do distance or online education, we have to figure out ways to pass on what we have learned to the next generation of Christian online educators so that the mission of ACCESS and Christian online education doesn’t end with us. My hope and expectation is that while the look and feel of ACCESS might continue to shift and change with current realities we won’t lose our distinctive as a leader in the field of Christian distance education. We may change how we conference together, we might think about alternatives to these gatherings, or we might consider new ways of delivering our content. But that should not change who we are now or who we are yet to become. I believe that good things are yet to come. However, it takes effort on the part of each of us to invite others to join ACCESS, to attend ACCESS conferences and webinars, and to be part of the larger conversation Christian distance education. As a community, we have the responsibility to share our resources with one another and to learn from one another. For most of us, our resources are somewhat “challenged” and if we’re going to set the pace for what it means to deliver quality theological education, we’re going to have to find new ways of collaborating and establishing consortial models of education. Thank you all for your support of the mission of ACCESS as it seeks to support the mission of God. Conference Attendees This year we had 35 attendees representing 25 different institutions or organizations. We had representation by administrators, faculty, instructional designers, and directors to name a few of the constituents. There were a number of first-timers as well as longstanding members. One attendee said, “I’m going to lean on my Provost and Dean to attend next year. They have to hear this stuff!” Another member wrote to tell me, “[We have come a long way] and much has changed in distance education at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. Now, we're not only talking about online learning and blended learning, we're talking about mobile learning and this year the use of games. I wonder what we'll be talking about in another 13 years. Actually, I wonder what we'll be talking about next year or five years from now that we don't even have the technologies for today.” We had two sponsors representing IOTA Solutions and BibleMesh. I would encourage you to check out their products as you continue looking for ways to improve your programs. Course of the Year Award
Workshops Plenary sessions In 2010 the US Department of Education proposed regulations that higher education institutions must obtain state authorization to legally offer distance or correspondence courses to students in a state in which it is not physically located, i.e. out-of-state students. The Department's proposed regulation raised awareness among states about the variety and scope of out-of-state distance education programs and alerted them to the fact that they can legally make higher education institutions obtain authorization to teach the students who reside in their states. Recently State Authorization and Reciprocity Agreements have been created to help institutions navigate the bureaucratic and financial web associated with gaining state authorization. Julie Goetz, of Huntington University, led an excellent discussion of what various states/institutions are doing to stay legal for less. For more information, visit here. Chris VanBuskirk and Michael Freeman, of Lancaster Bible College, showed us “under the hood” of those courses winning the COTY award. It was a great way for attendees to see what made those courses work well and for the course representatives to engage us in what went into course creation. For more information about the COTY course winners, visit our page. Keynote speaker Annual Business Meeting Membership update: · 2014-2015 – join/renew: 83 memberships · 68 institutional memberships · 15 individual memberships Elections:
Special Report
We are hoping to do some new things with regard to ongoing course evaluations, culminating in our annual COTY award. It is hoped that we can provide assessment throughout the year on course development for member institutions. More information will be provided as we finalize these plans. Additionally, we plan to offer a wide range of webinars throughout the year. It is our hope that you will encourage your entire institution, representing faculty, administrators, staff, and students, and alumni to fully participate in these webinars. We are beginning to see a shift in emphasis to an embedded model of online education rather than a stand-alone piece. As we more fully embrace a situated view of education, we want to involve more people in the process of understanding how online education fits into the mission and purpose of our institutions. We will provide more information as these webinars shape up. |